The biggest lie I can think of, was one odious quote was uttered by the profoundly turgid thinker himself: Kant, to postulate that “The human will is certainly an arbitrium sensitivum, not brutum, but liberum.” But as we pass the exit of what constitutes the ideal reason, we will thus find ourself at a place that is the complete opposite. Where liberum serves as a mere structural image of ordinary life, and ordinary reason.
The noumenal will as served by a society reigned by pure abstractions, is a foundational element of those abstractions. But if we serve that notion onto its back with account to our perverse history and relate it to our perverse systems, we will find out that noumenal will has found itself in its purest illusory form. One you can worship in front of its divine altar, as an icon of illusory freedom, a transcendent myth in its utmost purity.
As we continue to exist in this present state of separation, human will remain stuck in a arbitrium brutum enforced upon man by our own structural doctrines. Thus the transcendental character of freedom remains intelligible on a noumenal level, which we have an imperative “ought” enforced upon us by that noumenal doctrine, one seemingly incomplete and mythical.
The Ordinary Human, one that is nurtured in bourgeois society alas, remain stuck in a brutum so profound once you are able to perceive it, it becomes an element so ordinary and imbued the world transforms itself into a perverse antinomy in itself. You can become reasonably free once you lay prostrate to the noumenal will, the harbinger of reason.